State Street Baptist Church

"The Church of the Living God, the Pillar and Ground of the Truth." - 1 Timothy 3:15

The Gospel - Puritan Style

Print the article

This entry was posted on 3/7/2007 10:22 PM and is filed under uncategorized.

I am reading a book by J. I. Packer, A Quest for Godliness; The Puritan Vision of the Christian Life, and I wanted to post an interesting statement reflecting the views of the Puritans regarding the gospel:
The Puritan position was that only God, by his Spirit, through his word, can bring sinners to faith, and that he does this, not to our order, but according to his own free purpose. Our evangelistic practice, the Puritans would say, must be in accord with this truth. Modes of action which imply another doctrine cannot be approved.
The Puritan position seems [undoubtedly] biblical, and ... its implications are of great importance for the reforming of inherited evangelistic traditions today. It implies, to start with, that all devices for exerting psychological pressure in order to precipitate 'decisions' must be [avoided], as being in truth presumptuous attempts to intrude into the province of the Holy Ghost. It means, further, that to [renounce] such devices is no loss, since their use can contribute nothing whatever to the effectiveness of evangelistic preaching. Indeed, it will in the long run detract from it; for while psychological pressures, skillfully handled, may produce the outward form of 'decision', they cannot bring about regeneration and a change of heart, and when the 'decisions' wear off those who registered them will be found 'gospel-hardened' and antagonistic. Such forcing of tactics can only do damage, perhaps incalculable damage, to men's souls. It follows, therefore, that high-speed evangelism is not a valid option. Evangelism must rather be conceived as a long-term enterprise of patient teaching and instruction, in which God's servants seek simply to be faithful in delivering the gospel message and applying it to human lives, and leave it to God's Spirit to draw men to faith through this message in his own way and at his own speed.

How does the Spirit work? Does he authentically work through our begging people to walk an aisle, or does he work most powerfully through the preaching of God's word? "Faith comes by hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ" (Romans 10:17).

Bro. Todd
 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

    • 4/23/2007 2:09 PM Steve Lawrence wrote:
      Your question made me think of a section in Peter Kreefts commentary on Pascal's Pensees (I know that he is not reformed and has some serious flaws, but I at least think this gives an explanation of the thought behind psycho appeal).
      "Pascal shows that Christianity is
      1. psychologically respectable, becasue it understands the truth about man;
      2. phsychologically attractive, because it promises true happiness, the good for man; and
      3. objectively true, tells the truth about God (the point of traditional apologetics)
      The order fo the three points is of more than scholarly importance. It helps acount for why the Pensees works. Pascal first 1 shows that Christianity is a viable candidate. Then 2 he shows that it is an attractive candidate. Perhaps it is too good to be true--we have not proved its truth yet--but at least it is good, and good for us...(arminian stuff)...The inclusion of 1 and 2 is crucial, for before Pascal convinced you of them, you wanted Christianity to be false, becuase you hated and feared it. After 1 and 2, if they work, you love it and want it to be true.
      If a Christianity is true, and if b there are two obstacles to believing it, namely, the irrational obstacle (hate and fear) and the rational obstacle (ignorance and misunderstanding), and if c neutrality is impossible, then it follows that replacing this hate with love and this fear with fascination is honest and serves the truth just as much as ratinal arguments do. If a man is dying of both cancer and pneumonia, the cure of either disease is just as much in the service of his life and health as the cure of the other." End Quote.

      Okay, some questions come out of this:
      Is it wrong to use psychological appeal to get someone to listen to the message?
      How can we preach the gospel without psychological appeal? Can truly offer the gospel in a neutral, sterile,non-pyschological way?
      Isn't good psychology ultimately about human happiness and isn't the gospel about happiness?
      Didn't the prophets plead with the people to repent? They appeared to use everything from allegory to drama to provacative speech to plead with people.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.